The new Ofsted Framework is being implemented in November 2025. The major change is the removal of the overall grading and the introduction of a record card system to show the outcome of a school inspection.
Another significant development is the introduction of an inspection nominee role in schools, which could be one of the most positive outcomes of the new framework. This represents a major shift in the school inspection experience.
The concept of a nominee has long been recognised in further education and skills inspections as central to inspection readiness and success, but it remains unfamiliar to many in schools. Schools may soon realise that this role is far more than an administrative adjustment; it is an opportunity to be strategic and shape the inspection process itself.
At the heart of every inspection is dialogue, a two-way process where inspectors seek evidence, context, and assurance that a school is delivering high-quality education and safeguarding pupils effectively.
A well-prepared nominee acts as the anchor point for that dialogue.
While headteachers juggle multiple demands during inspection, leading the school, supporting staff, communicating with parents, and engaging with governors, the nominee’s role is to ensure that no question goes unanswered, no context goes unexplained, and no evidence is overlooked.
A successful nominee ensures the right people are “on the right bus, in the right seats, facing the right direction”, meaning that the right individuals are in the right meetings, at the right time, with the right evidence. This saves valuable time and prevents missed opportunities to present information that could influence outcomes.
Ofsted’s guidance outlines the nominee’s operational responsibilities, coordinating meetings, briefing staff, and liaising with inspectors, but the benefits extend far beyond logistics.
An effective nominee can:
Shape perceptions by providing context that ensures inspectors see the full story of the school.
Anticipate needs by pre-empting evidence requests, reducing stress and disruption.
Safeguard leadership time by acting as the main liaison, allowing the headteacher to remain strategic rather than reactive.
In this way, the nominee becomes both a buffer and a facilitator, protecting headteachers from excessive operational pressure while strengthening inspection dialogue.
For schools within multi-academy trusts (MATs), this new role presents an even more strategic opportunity.
Many trusts already have school improvement partners (SIPs) who act as a form of quality assurance across schools. These individuals possess a deep understanding of performance data, school context, and improvement priorities, precisely the information inspectors seek.
Using a trust-level nominee, such as a SIP, allows for:
Consistency across schools in inspection approach and preparation.
Reduced workload for headteachers, who can focus on leadership rather than evidence collation.
Greater assurance that inspectors receive accurate, well-contextualised information.
This model could become a cornerstone of how MATs manage inspection readiness while supporting the professional wellbeing of school leaders.
Despite its potential, the nominee role can be undermined by poor planning and implementation. Schools should avoid:
Last-minute decisions, waiting for inspection notification before identifying a nominee.
Lack of authority, appointing someone too junior to influence the process.
Insufficient training, assuming the role is simple risks missed evidence and miscommunication.
Preparation remains key. Schools should identify a nominee early, invest in training, and conduct mock inspections to simulate real dialogue and evidence management. These mock inspections are not designed to pressure teachers or leaders but to test the process for the nominee.
The introduction of the nominee marks a shift from reactive inspection management to proactive inspection readiness. It allows schools to present their story confidently, manage risk, and reduce unnecessary stress.
Far from being a bureaucratic addition, the nominee is a catalyst for clarity, confidence, and collaboration.
For schools, particularly those within trusts, this is an opportunity to approach inspection not as a disruption, but as a professional conversation that highlights impact, celebrates achievement, and demonstrates the quality of leadership.
The new Ofsted nominee is not just an administrative reform; it is a game-changer for school leadership and workload.